Skip to main content

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) steps

 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Tool

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic, proactive method for evaluating a process to identify where and how it might fail and to assess the relative impact of different failures, in order to identify the parts of the process that are most in need of change. FMEA includes review of the following:

Steps in the process

Failure modes (What could go wrong?)

Failure causes (Why would the failure happen?)

Failure effects (What would be the consequences of each failure?)

Teams use FMEA to evaluate processes for possible failures and to prevent them by correcting the processes proactively rather than reacting to adverse events after failures have occurred. This emphasis on prevention may reduce risk of harm to both patients and staff. FMEA is particularly useful in evaluating a new process prior to implementation and in assessing the impact of a proposed change to an existing process.

Background

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was developed outside of health care and is now being used in health care to assess risk of failure and harm in processes and to identify the most important areas for process improvements. FMEA has been used by hundreds of hospitals in a variety of Institute for Healthcare Improvement programs, including Idealized Design of Medication Systems (IDMS), Patient Safety Collaborative, and Patient Safety Summit.

 

Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis must be done in a step-wise fashion since each step builds on the previous one.  Here’s an overview of the 10 steps to a Process FMEA.

STEP 1:  Review the process

Use a process flowchart to identify each process component.

List each process component in the FMEA table.

If it starts feeling like the scope is too big, it probably is.  This is a good time to break the Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis into more manageable chunks.

STEP 2:  Brainstorm potential failure modes

Review existing documentation and data for clues about all of the ways each component can failure.

The list should be exhaustive – it can be paired down and items can be combined after this initial list is generated.

There will likely be several potential failures for each component.

STEP 3:  List potential effects of each failure

The effect is the impact the failure has on the end product or on subsequent steps in the process.

There will likely be more than one effect for each failure.

STEP 4:  Assign Severity rankings

Based on the severity of the consequences of failure.

STEP 5:  Assign Occurrence rankings

Rate the severity of each effect using customized ranking scales as a guide.

STEP 6:  Assign Detection rankings

What are the chances the failure will be detected prior to it occurring.

STEP 7:  Calculate the RPN

Severity X Occurrence X Detection

STEP 8:  Develop the action plan

Decide which failures will be worked on based on the Risk Priority Numbers.  Focus on the highest RPNs.

Define who will do what by when.

STEP 9:  Take action

Implement the improvements identified by your Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis team.

STEP 10:  Calculate the resulting RPN

Re-evaluate each of the potential failures once improvements have been made and determine the impact of the improvements.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accident / Incident Ratio Studies (F.E Bird Triangle)

The accident triangle, also known as Heinrich's triangle or Bird's triangle, is a theory of industrial accident prevention. It shows a relationship between serious accidents, minor accidents and near misses and proposes that if the number of minor accidents is reduced then there will be a corresponding fall in the number of serious accidents The triangle was first proposed by Herbert William Heinrich in 1931 and has since been updated and expanded upon by other writers, notable Franck E. Bird. It is often shown pictorially as a triangle or pyramid and has been described as a cornerstone of 20th century workplace health and safety philosophy. In recent times, it has come under criticism over the values allocated to each category of accident and for focusing only on the reduction in minor injuries. There is no shortage of data on incidents such as accidents or near misses. Some researchers have studied the figures in details and concluded that there appears to be a relationship b

World Safety Day - 28 April

History of 28 - April;   The annual World Day for Safety and Health at Work on 28 April promotes the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases globally. It is an awareness-raising campaign intended to focus international attention on the magnitude of the problem and on how promoting and creating a safety and health culture can help reduce the number of work-related deaths and injuries. The ILO celebrates the World Day for Safety and Health at Work on the 28 April to promote the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases globally. It is an awareness-raising campaign intended to focus international attention on emerging trends in the field of occupational safety and health and on the magnitude of work-related injuries, diseases and fatalities worldwide. With the celebration of the World Day for Safety and Health at Work, the ILO promotes the creation of a global preventative safety and health culture involving ILO constituents and all key stakeholders in this field. In

Involvement in the Investigation Process

 Who should carry out the investigation? Among those who may make an investigation are: The safety practitioner or one of his staff A member of management. The supervisor, foreman or chargehand. Mangers You will remember that many causes of accidents are due to management system, or rather the lack of effective system. The objective of any analysis or investigative report is to provide management with a means of deciding why their policies and procedures failed to prevent accidents, injuries and ill health. As it is management who ultimately make the decisions and allocate resources, it is vitally important that they are actively involved at every step of the procedures.  Supervisor Usually, it is the immediate supervisor of the injured person or the supervisor in whose department the damaged property belonged, who is better qualified to carry out the investigation than any other member of the management team, including the safety practitioners: He is likely to know most about the situ