Skip to main content

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) steps

 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Tool

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic, proactive method for evaluating a process to identify where and how it might fail and to assess the relative impact of different failures, in order to identify the parts of the process that are most in need of change. FMEA includes review of the following:

Steps in the process

Failure modes (What could go wrong?)

Failure causes (Why would the failure happen?)

Failure effects (What would be the consequences of each failure?)

Teams use FMEA to evaluate processes for possible failures and to prevent them by correcting the processes proactively rather than reacting to adverse events after failures have occurred. This emphasis on prevention may reduce risk of harm to both patients and staff. FMEA is particularly useful in evaluating a new process prior to implementation and in assessing the impact of a proposed change to an existing process.

Background

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was developed outside of health care and is now being used in health care to assess risk of failure and harm in processes and to identify the most important areas for process improvements. FMEA has been used by hundreds of hospitals in a variety of Institute for Healthcare Improvement programs, including Idealized Design of Medication Systems (IDMS), Patient Safety Collaborative, and Patient Safety Summit.

 

Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis must be done in a step-wise fashion since each step builds on the previous one.  Here’s an overview of the 10 steps to a Process FMEA.

STEP 1:  Review the process

Use a process flowchart to identify each process component.

List each process component in the FMEA table.

If it starts feeling like the scope is too big, it probably is.  This is a good time to break the Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis into more manageable chunks.

STEP 2:  Brainstorm potential failure modes

Review existing documentation and data for clues about all of the ways each component can failure.

The list should be exhaustive – it can be paired down and items can be combined after this initial list is generated.

There will likely be several potential failures for each component.

STEP 3:  List potential effects of each failure

The effect is the impact the failure has on the end product or on subsequent steps in the process.

There will likely be more than one effect for each failure.

STEP 4:  Assign Severity rankings

Based on the severity of the consequences of failure.

STEP 5:  Assign Occurrence rankings

Rate the severity of each effect using customized ranking scales as a guide.

STEP 6:  Assign Detection rankings

What are the chances the failure will be detected prior to it occurring.

STEP 7:  Calculate the RPN

Severity X Occurrence X Detection

STEP 8:  Develop the action plan

Decide which failures will be worked on based on the Risk Priority Numbers.  Focus on the highest RPNs.

Define who will do what by when.

STEP 9:  Take action

Implement the improvements identified by your Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis team.

STEP 10:  Calculate the resulting RPN

Re-evaluate each of the potential failures once improvements have been made and determine the impact of the improvements.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Accident / Incident Ratio Studies (F.E Bird Triangle)

The accident triangle, also known as Heinrich's triangle or Bird's triangle, is a theory of industrial accident prevention. It shows a relationship between serious accidents, minor accidents and near misses and proposes that if the number of minor accidents is reduced then there will be a corresponding fall in the number of serious accidents The triangle was first proposed by Herbert William Heinrich in 1931 and has since been updated and expanded upon by other writers, notable Franck E. Bird. It is often shown pictorially as a triangle or pyramid and has been described as a cornerstone of 20th century workplace health and safety philosophy. In recent times, it has come under criticism over the values allocated to each category of accident and for focusing only on the reduction in minor injuries. There is no shortage of data on incidents such as accidents or near misses. Some researchers have studied the figures in details and concluded that there appears to be a relationship b...
Post a Comment
Read more

EVENT TREE ANALYSIS (ETA)

Event tree analysis ( ETA ) is a forward, top-down, logical modeling technique for both success and failure that explores responses through a single initiating event and lays a path for assessing probabilities of the outcomes and overall system analysis. This analysis technique is used to analyze the effects of functioning or failed systems given that an event has occurred.   ETA is a powerful tool that will identify all consequences of a system that have a probability of occurring after an initiating event that can be applied to a wide range of systems including: nuclear power plants, spacecraft,  and chemical plants. This technique may be applied to a system early in the design process to identify potential issues that may arise, rather than correcting the issues after they occur. With this forward logic process, use of ETA as a tool in risk assessment can help to prevent negative outcomes from occurring, by providing a risk assessor with the probability of occurrence...
Post a Comment
Read more

Maslow ( Hierarchy of Needs)

 Abraham Maslow suggested five levels of human need, which he arranged in a hierarchy. The order in which the needs are listed is significant in two ways: It is the order in which they are said to appear in the normal development of the person. It is the order in which they have to be satisfied and if earlier needs are not satisfied, the person may never get around to doing much about the later ones. From this theory, you might expect that people in a poor society will be mostly concerned with physiological and safety needs, whereas those in an affluent society will manage to satisfy those lower needs in the hierarchy and , in many cases, will be preoccupied with the need for self-actualization. However, Maslow's hierarchy stresses that co-operation can occur only at higher levels between mature individuals, the lower order needs leading to conflict between individuals. Yet, primitive tribes seem to co-operate more than advanced societies, where conflict between individuals is enco...
Post a Comment
Read more