Skip to main content

Health and Safety Monitoring and Measuring Techniques

 Active and Reactive Monitoring's

Active means before it happens, while Reactive means after it has happened.

  • Active monitoring provides information on compliance with predetermined standards and can be used as a predictor of future performance.
  • Reactive monitoring relies on past data on loss-causing events and therefore only provides a historical picture of performance.

No single measure, by itself, will effectively measure the performance of the organization. while we will be favoring the use of active monitoring, there is still a role for the reactive monitoring of accident and ill-health data.

what is important is to find some factor that can be measured which will related directly to a specific objective in the safety policy, arrangements or control.

A- Active Monitoring Data:

Active monitoring measure if objectives have been achieved.

There is a wide range of data that can be collated to assess health and safety performance, some of which are active - such as the uptake rate for toolbox talks or the completion of risk assessments against the target.

these data cover the extent to which plans and objectives have been set and achieved, and include:

  • Specialist Staff.
  • Safety Policy.
  • Training.
  • Extent of Compliance.
  • Risk assessments.
  • Health and Safety committee meetings.
  • Perceptions of management commitment.
B- Reactive Monitoring Data

Other data  area reactive, and are typically based on accidents and incidents that have occurred. they include;
  • Near misses.
  • Damage only accidents.
  • lost time accidents..
  • fatalities.
  • Sickness Absence.
  • Health Surveillance.
  • Cases of occupational diseases.
  • Reportable dangerous occurrences.
  • Reportable Major Injuries.
  • Three-day, lost-time accidents.
Active Monitoring Techniques

1. Health and Safety Audits
The health and safety audit should be an in-depth, systematic, critical investigation in to all aspects of safety. It needs to include management systems, policy, attitudes, training and practice.

2. Workplace Inspections
A workplace inspection involves someone walking around a part of the premises, looking for hazards or non-compliance with legislation rules or safe practice, and taking notes. The task is made easier and methodical if a checklist is used.

3. Safety Tours
A safety tour follows a predetermined route through the area or workshop and can be conducted by a range of personnel, from works managers to supervisor and safety representatives. Such tours typically last only 15 minutes or so and may be carried out at weekly intervals to ensure that standard of housekeeping are acceptable, gangways and fire exits are unobstructed an hazards are dealt with quickly.

4. Safety Sampling
This is an Organized system of regular random sampling. its purpose is to obtain a measure of safety attitudes and possible sources of accidents, by the systematic recording of hazard situations observed during inspections made along predetermined routes in a factory or on a site.

5. Safety Surveys
A safety survey is a detailed examination of a particular safety aspect. It Could involve, for example, a detailed inspection of all aspects of fire-fighting equipment; examining all the safety devices on machines; or checking all the emergency exits.

6. Climate Surveys
There are techniques to assess an organizations attitude towards health and safety so that improvements can be made.

7. Behavioral Observations
Monitoring the way worker behave ( for example, the use of PPE or the correct driving techniques) is a valuable active monitoring techniques, as it detects issues that can be addressed through behavioral change programs before injuries occur.

8. Benchmarking
Benchmarking is the comparison of an organizations performance to others within the sector or country as a whole. Benchmarking can also be carried out between sites within the same organization to identify strength and weaknesses and therefore develop improvements plans.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accident / Incident Ratio Studies (F.E Bird Triangle)

The accident triangle, also known as Heinrich's triangle or Bird's triangle, is a theory of industrial accident prevention. It shows a relationship between serious accidents, minor accidents and near misses and proposes that if the number of minor accidents is reduced then there will be a corresponding fall in the number of serious accidents The triangle was first proposed by Herbert William Heinrich in 1931 and has since been updated and expanded upon by other writers, notable Franck E. Bird. It is often shown pictorially as a triangle or pyramid and has been described as a cornerstone of 20th century workplace health and safety philosophy. In recent times, it has come under criticism over the values allocated to each category of accident and for focusing only on the reduction in minor injuries. There is no shortage of data on incidents such as accidents or near misses. Some researchers have studied the figures in details and concluded that there appears to be a relationship b

World Safety Day - 28 April

History of 28 - April;   The annual World Day for Safety and Health at Work on 28 April promotes the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases globally. It is an awareness-raising campaign intended to focus international attention on the magnitude of the problem and on how promoting and creating a safety and health culture can help reduce the number of work-related deaths and injuries. The ILO celebrates the World Day for Safety and Health at Work on the 28 April to promote the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases globally. It is an awareness-raising campaign intended to focus international attention on emerging trends in the field of occupational safety and health and on the magnitude of work-related injuries, diseases and fatalities worldwide. With the celebration of the World Day for Safety and Health at Work, the ILO promotes the creation of a global preventative safety and health culture involving ILO constituents and all key stakeholders in this field. In

Involvement in the Investigation Process

 Who should carry out the investigation? Among those who may make an investigation are: The safety practitioner or one of his staff A member of management. The supervisor, foreman or chargehand. Mangers You will remember that many causes of accidents are due to management system, or rather the lack of effective system. The objective of any analysis or investigative report is to provide management with a means of deciding why their policies and procedures failed to prevent accidents, injuries and ill health. As it is management who ultimately make the decisions and allocate resources, it is vitally important that they are actively involved at every step of the procedures.  Supervisor Usually, it is the immediate supervisor of the injured person or the supervisor in whose department the damaged property belonged, who is better qualified to carry out the investigation than any other member of the management team, including the safety practitioners: He is likely to know most about the situ